Lessons in Community Organising for Identitarians

Despite the resurgence of identity-based politics lately e.g. Trump, Brexit, and Len Pen, nonetheless there are serious concerns about the long-term viability of this movement. Trump is falling short of his promises, Brexit has stalled, Le Pen missed out, and the Alt-Right movement drove itself into a ditch in Charlottesville.

All of which begs the question: is this a viable long-term movement, or a balloon about to fizz out across the room. The answer lies in two quotes:

1. YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW

Trump, Farage and Le Pen all have two things in common:

A - They are largely self-made, spontaneous leaders. Obviously they are influenced by their parents, but otherwise they are self-made.

B - Their support base is largely reactive in nature. Brexit and Le Pen were largely reactions to the Merkel-inspired invasion of refugees into Europe, and the increase in terrorism across Europe. And while Trump's support was based on a wider range of anti-globalist issues, that too is somewhat reactive.

And the problem with the identitarian movement generally is:

C - The relationships between supporters tend to be superficial and ephemeral i.e. we come together around campaigns, or the news/outrage of the day, and we communicate mostly via social media. But those connections largely rescind the rest of the time, and we're left on our own.

2. POLITICS IS DOWNSTREAM OF CULTURE

But in order to create a viable long-term movement, we need to move beyond spontaneous reactions, and into the proactive realm. And we need to move beyond ephemeral relationships and into a deeper relationship dynamic i.e. a supportive community that embodies our ideas, and inspires us to action, and keeps us on track, and has its own momentum, resources, spirit and wisdom to guide us.

A sustainable movement requires a group with a sound mind, body and spirit, in order to have any chance of surviving in a tough world. And the enormity of that challenge necessitates a deeper relationship dynamic. Ad hoc connections just don't create the type of dynamic required to build a thriving group, the connections are too weak.

So, how do we build such a group that is proactive and produces its own leaders? And has a deep relationship dynamic that creates momentum? That is the million dollar question, and that is the next phase of rebuilding the identity-based movement. Successful groups have certain qualities and we need to discover what they are.

Below, is a taste of what community organising looks like. These videos are mostly on the liberal side of politics, and some of them borrow from religion, but nonetheless there are lessons to be learned here for all identitarians.

Due to health problems, I can't do this topic justice. This will just be a glimpse, a taste of a much bigger topic. Others will have to take the ball and run with it, if our movement is to have any future. It's a much bigger topic, and smarter people than me will need to get involved.

But this is the direction we need to head in. In order to be creating leaders, and taking charge of our own destiny, we need mature communities.

Note that I don't see small isolated communities as the ultimate goal, but rather, as communities being the vehicle to create a much bigger network of co-ordinated groups. As small groups, we are still impotent. Only when co-ordinated into a large group do we become effective in politics, and effective if some sort of collapse happens. From little things, big things grow.

On the Group Fitness website, I outlined a structure to bind together the various subgroups of white/Western world with a unifying meta narrative. But we also need to build specific groups, and that is question here i.e. what are the qualities of successful groups and how do we organise them at the community level?

This is the next phase of the identity-based movement. Either we make this transition to community organising, or we die out like the dodo bird.










Jonathan Haidt, The Righteous Mind:

We are Homo duplex; we are 90 percent chimp and 10 percent bee. Successful religions work on both levels of our nature to suppress selfishness, or at least to channel it in ways that often pay dividends for the group...

Religions are moral exoskeletons. If you live in a religious community, you are enmeshed in a set of norms, relationships, and institutions that ... influence your behaviour. But if you are an atheist living in a looser community with a less binding moral matrix, you might have to rely somewhat more on an internal moral compass... That might sound appealing to rationalists, but it is also a recipe for anomie--Durkheim's word for what happens to a society that no longer has a shared moral order. (It means, literally, "normlessness"). We evolved to live, trade, and trust within shared moral matrices. When societies lose their grip on individuals, allowing all to do as they please, the result is often a decrease in happiness and an increase in suicide...

Societies that forgo the exoskeleton of religion should reflect carefully on what will happen to them over several generations. We don’t really know, because the first atheistic societies have only emerged in Europe in the last decades. They are the least efficient societies ever known at turning resources (of which they have a lot) into offspring (of which they have few)...

Let us embrace a realistic picture of human nature, then maximize the benefits of our hivishness while minimizing its negative externalities.

That's just a start. It's a much bigger topic than I can cover.

Note that I'm not advocating for either atheism or religion. The identitarian movement contains both subgroups, who will create their own distinct communities, and we need to get along and learn from each other.

File under: rules for "radicals".

Weather Bombs: is China hacking the ionosphere?

We've spoken in the past about China's full-spectrum covert warfare, known as Unrestricted Warfare, of which the cyber-war is just the tip of the iceberg.

I have no doubt that China is very active in covert warfare, and a lot of "accidents" in the West are not accidents at all, particularly in my country Australia which has a very large Chinese population, and is probably crawling with Chinese operatives.

My health doesn't permit me to compile much proof of this activity, so I'll just post this speculative video, and time will tell whether or not China is hacking the ionosphere, and influencing storms in other parts of the world.


We're told that, throughout history, the incumbent power under-estimates the strength of the new rising power. If China now has such technology, I have no doubt they will forge ahead and use it. There is certainly no shortage of "unusual" and "record" weather events over the past couple of years.

If China is using technology like HAARP to create storms, one clue to look for is a preceding event in the news that would provoke China into using it e.g. if some political action in the West goes against China. (For instance, there was a noticeable spike in global "accidents" following China's stock market crash in 2015, which they blamed on America).

Also, if China is engineering storms, it may think that America is doing likewise, so China may even think that natural storms in China are caused by America, and retaliate.

This is all speculative, but this is the spooky future we face. I have no doubt that China has an army of mad scientists trying to create all sorts of new weapons, and it's only a matter of time before that reality dawns upon us.

And as history shows, it usually comes sooner than you think, as the speed of the rising power catches everyone by surprise.

(Russia may also have similar technology, but I'd expect Russia to be more reticent to use it. China, on the other hand, strikes me as reckless and desperate to regain power, by any means).

File under: "the greatest intelligence failure in our history".

The Alt-Right brand is dead

Nobody has defined the Alt-Right more so than Richard Spencer, its de facto leader. Well spoken, well presented, reasonable, and civilised, Spencer articulated an alternative position between mainstream cuckservatives and far-right lunatics. A "middle" ground that could appeal to the masses. And appeal it did, breaking into the public debate at the highest levels along with the rise of Trump.

Alas, over the past year, that clear delineation has been muddied by Spencer flirting with the Nazi fringe, and failing to disavow the lunatics. Examples include:

- Downplaying Nazi salutes as Roman salutes.
- His "fashy" haircut.
- Describing the torch rally as "beautiful" when told it looked like a lynch mob.
- Thinking that marching with a "Unite The Right" crowd was a good idea.
- Bringing the far-right Jewish fixation back into the frame.

The end result is that the clear delineation is now gone, and Spencer appears not much different from the far-right loonies. There is no Alt-Right anymore, just the old far-right, at least that's how it appears to the public.

And now with the Charlottesville tragedy on top of that, it's game over for the Alt-Right brand. There is no coming back.

RamzPaul warned Spencer about flirting with the neo-Nazi fringe. But for some reason, he ignored it. I have no idea whether Spencer is naive or what his motives are. But it's too late now.

So, now anyone who wants to create a serious Alt-Right political or cultural group, is going to have to find their own brand, and learn from these lessons, and proactively keep a huge chasm between themselves and the lunatic neo-Nazi fringe, and probably abandon all forms of street protests too, and focus on real power instead of faux power.

Spencer said that Charlottesville was the "beginning of white civil rights movement". It's not. I don't know what planet Spencer is on, but he has now lost mainstream interest, not gained it.

Ultimately the future of white/Western people requires us to build articulated cultural/community type groups, from the ground up. That's not a rally, not a protest, and not a street movement. It's a holistic group that serves all our needs, and draws in everyday people, rather than turning them away with neo-Nazi crap.

RamzPaul on Charlottesville & the stupidity of marches

RamzPaul talks about the degeneration of the Alt-Right movement into neo-Nazi trash, and the stupidity of marches in a climate ruled by predatory bureaucrats and media.


VICE News has some watchable coverage of Charlottseville, albeit a skewed coverage.  But this is how the general public now sees the Alt-Right movement, as Nazis.

The whole point of the Alt-Right, as I understood it, was to differentiate from both Cuckservatives and Neo-Nazis, and offer something in between that would attract the general public. But now all the public sees is Nazis. This is what happens when you get a fashy haircut and start chanting with torches and flags.

White violence, faux power, and group fitness

In the wake of the violence in Charlottesville this weekend, we should be asking the question: what is power?

Is it found in noisy demonstrations?

Is it found in stirring speeches?

Is it found behind a cudgel and a crusader shield?

Is it found under a flag or a torch?

Is it found in an angry or witty YouTube video?

Or is it found in terrorism? In driving your car into a counter-protest?

Nope, these are all faux power. They make you feel good in the moment, and feel like you're doing something, but ultimately they do very little to advance the interests of white/Western people. And terrorism will do the opposite, it will just increase the scrutiny and control over us.

So, what is power? It is Group Fitness.

Group Fitness recognises that power is found in the State, and whites will only have power if they are (a) involved in politics or (b) preparing shadow organisations for when/if the State collapses or turns against them.

That's it. All the rest is noise and distraction.

The difference between Group Fitness and noisy faux power is recognising where power is, and what type of group is required to combat it. Group Fitness is intelligent and focused. It is a movement built upon community and upon articulated ideas. It grows like a cult, not like a rally.

Group Fitness sees white/Western people as an organic unit, which must have a sound mind, body and spirit, if it is to survive. It builds quietly, drawing people in like a cult, not like a rally.

So how do we make it happen? We need to start small groups that have intelligent leadership, and well articulated ideas, and that build community around these ideas. From little things, big things grow.

The future belongs to those who can organise white/Western people into a cohesive/organic unit that is intelligent and well resourced enough to compete in politics, and prepare for the worst if the State is turned against us.

Power is found in being part of an intelligent and cohesive unit. It is not found in noisy rallies.

So, find a group, or start a group, that has intelligent leadership. And build it slowly and quietly. And if we have enough groups like that, and we co-ordinate them together, then we might have some chance of surviving in an increasingly dangerous world. Otherwise, we will just be a laughing stock, and an evolutionary dodo bird.

To compete in this world requires intelligence and organisation - not noise, bluster or posturing. So get involved in an intelligent group, or you are wasting your time making useless noise.

See also: Group Fitness - Mind, Body & Spirit